THANK YOU FOR SUBSCRIBING
New global reforms will change where tech giants pay taxes in Asia and make the international tax system more robust.
Currently, there are approximately two billion internet users in Asia alone, with plenty of possibilities for expansion. In addition to hosting foreign internet giants like Facebook, Asia's mature and rising market economies are home to several locally headquartered digital giants, such as Alibaba, JD.com, Tencent, and Rakuten. Where these internet companies and other global giants pay taxes will shift due to new, universally endorsed tax laws.
Many Asian nations have found it challenging to tax tech companies in the past, mainly because many of them only have a digital presence there. Many individuals believe that the current international standards for taxing profits are out-of-date and unfair, but they haven't changed. It can be difficult to collect taxes on deliveries of small packages made through e-commerce and cross-border digital services.
Some Asian nations have begun to enact digital services taxes, such as user-based turnover taxes on digital activities or withholding taxes on payments for international digital services. However, if a new worldwide profit taxation system is implemented, these might become obsolete. Since multinational corporations are now declaring profits in these nations that are higher than the local proportion of total sales, investment centres like Singapore and Hong Kong SAR could lose up to 0.15 percent of GDP in corporate tax collection.
High-income nations like Australia, China, Japan, and Korea, which have sizable domestic markets, would increase revenue, whereas developing nations like Vietnam might see a decrease.
“Asia-Pacific nations, in particular, can invest in strategies to use digitisation for tax administration, lowering tax evasion, increasing revenue mobilisation, and improving tax collection efficiency”
The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development's (OECD-IF) 134 members included the majority of Asian economies. These members agreed to distribute profits taxing rights to nations where consumers and users are located, reflecting the digital presence. While specifics are still being worked out, the agreed-upon global reforms call for a portion of profits from multinational corporations with global sales above EUR 20 billion (roughly the top 100 global corporations) to be distributed across nations in proportion to local sales and subject to local taxation.
Experts examine the digital landscape in Asia and the impact of proposals, like those from the OECD-IF, on corporation tax receipts across Asian nations in a new IMF staff paper. Additionally, they describe the benefits and drawbacks of digital services taxes and project their income potential. Finally, they estimate the additional revenue that could be gained from collecting value-added tax on cross-border e-commerce products and digital services transactions.
The agreed-upon improvements may inspire more extensive reforms that affect all businesses and a larger portion of profits. As a result, there would be a greater reallocation of tax revenue around nations, with investment hubs in Asia predicted to suffer the greatest losses and several developing economies expected to benefit. In addition to being easier to administer, digital services taxes do not generate much revenue. Digital services taxes still expose businesses to tax evasion and have the potential to skew business decisions. Furthermore, because they are typically only applied to major companies with foreign headquarters, they might complicate trade relations.
Since more than half of all services traded in Asia are now delivered digitally, collecting value-added taxes on these cross-border transactions is challenging. Value-added taxes are also free from cross-border e-commerce sales of products when they are sent in tiny international packages. An increase in revenue of 0.04 to 0.11 percent of GDP in some Asian nations, or an additional USD 166 million in Bangladesh, USD 4.8 billion in India, USD 1.1 billion in Indonesia, 365 million in the Philippines, and USD 264 million in Vietnam, could be achieved by requiring non-resident providers of digital services and e-commerce marketplaces to register with local tax authorities and remit value-added taxes on their sales.
Tech giants will grow in Asian nations as Asian consumers and businesses boost online engagement in the coming years, raising the importance of taxation in a digitalising economy. Asia-Pacific nations, in particular, can invest in strategies to use digitisation for tax administration, lowering tax evasion, increasing revenue mobilisation, and improving tax collection efficiency. The key changes that are yet to come could strengthen the international tax system for the digital era by allowing countries to further shape the agreement under the OECD-led Inclusive Framework.
Read Also